CounterSoft Community Server

Welcome to CounterSoft Community Server Sign in | Join | Help
Home Forums

Possible to removed fields.

Last post 07-01-2008, 8:27 PM by mumbles. 7 replies.
Sort Posts:
  •  06-30-2008, 2:43 PM

    Possible to removed fields.

    Hello All,

    So my problem is that i'd like some fields removed from the application GUI entirely. Field we don't use under any circumstances. Now, in Field Visibility Scheme, i removed these fields. And when i navigate to Issues.aspx all is good in the world. However, when we enter bugs and when we are actually on the issue, we still see these fields. See following screenshots, we've removed "Severity";

    http://tuffguyphotography.com/gemini1.jpg

    http://tuffguyphotography.com/gemini2.jpg

    Is there any way to not see them anywhere in the Gemini GUI?

    TIA

  •  06-30-2008, 3:36 PM

    Re: Possible to removed fields.

    You need to remove them from all schemes (edit, create, view and issue list).

    Which version of Gemini are you running?

  •  06-30-2008, 9:12 PM

    Re: Possible to removed fields.

    The latest 3.0.3
  •  06-30-2008, 9:14 PM

    Re: Possible to removed fields.

    And i think they are removed for all users and schemes. I have 2 schemes, default and minimal. They both have severity checkbox unchecked.

  •  07-01-2008, 9:19 AM

    Re: Possible to removed fields.

    We can not seem to replicate it, are you sure you are running 3.0.3?

    Can you please send support your database?

  •  07-01-2008, 2:48 PM

    Re: Possible to removed fields.

    Sure thing, sending now.

  •  07-01-2008, 8:17 PM

    Re: Possible to removed fields.

    Ok, got the issue. You have not assigned a visibility scheme to your types.

    In the admin section, click on issue types and edit each type to assign it a field visibility scheme.

  •  07-01-2008, 8:27 PM

    Re: Possible to removed fields.

    That did it thanks.

    Just a suggestion....

    This security scheme stuff is pretty wacky. I know i'm american and we arent' the smartest chaps in the world, but... this stuff is rather complicated. I think you should have some security scenarios in the documentation, that are the minimal setups. Not everyone wants to have seperate groups and seperate types etc. etc. I would have been fine with the minimal setup for security and then just got rid of my fields... just my .02

    I realize it's a constant struggle with feature requests vs. complexity. Just wanted to put it out there. I feel your pain.

View as RSS news feed in XML